![]() In classic ray-based methods, there is no sound in the shadow zone. Now, why should we bother spending precious CPU cycles to compute diffraction rays? The first and most obvious need is to solve the shadow zone diffraction of the direct path. Practical Use Cases with Diffraction Hearing Sounds Behind Obstacles - Shadow Zone Diffraction of the Direct Path The yellow circle highlights the diffraction in the view zone. The shadow zone is defined where there is no line of sight between the emitter and listener, the reflection zone is where there are both line of sight and specular reflections due to the surface adjacent to the wedge, and the view zone is where there is only line of sight. The orange X marks the location of the source. Here they are illustrated on top of the frozen animation used above, where the orange X marks the location of the source.įigure 4 - Diffraction zones. The UTD defines three zones for given wedge and emitter positions: the shadow, view and reflection zones. It depends on incident distance and angle ρ and α i, diffracted distance and angle r and α d, and wedge shape nπ. Since in practice, it never is, the model will simply be less accurate when the edge is short.įigure 3 - Parameters of UTD as presented by Tsingos: A source E diffracts on the tip of a wedge, and the UTD predicts its magnitude and phase at the listener position L. For example, the edge should be infinitely long. Of course, as with all models, it relies on several assumptions. It takes into account the wedge shape, incident ray angle and frequency, among other things. The UTD models diffraction of light and electromagnetic waves, and predicts the amplitude and phase of a ray after it hits an edge. With video games in mind, Tsingos proposed in 2001 a ray-based model of sound propagation using the Uniform Theory of Diffraction (UTD). For those interested, Savioja et al’s overview referenced above surveys them quite extensively. There are several classes of these models. Ray-Based DiffractionĪlthough it is not simulated in the example above, it is possible to bolt an explicit model of diffraction on top of classic ray-based methods. ![]() The emitter has been marked as an orange X, the outer rim corresponds to the wavefront of the “direct sound”, the half rim inside corresponds to the reflection from the wall, and the dim perturbation marked by the red circle corresponds to diffraction at the corner. This is the result of diffraction.įigure 2 - Still image in the wave simulation animation of. At this point we see a dim circular wavefront emerging from the corner. In this frozen simulation, a perturbation has happened at the location of the orange X, and the ensuing wavefront has propagated outwards until the left side has hit a wall, reflected, and traveled beyond the corner. For example, let us observe one frame of Brian Hamilton’s animation of sound propagation generated from a wave-based simulation in Benoit’s blog. It is instructive to examine simulations of wave-based models to see where classic ray-based models fall short. While classic ray-based models model reflections by casting rays and making them reflect on surfaces, they typically neglect the wave properties of sounds, like diffraction. In contrast, ray-based models of sound propagation use rays to represent a single point on a wavefront that will eventually reach the listener, and is therefore a much simpler calculation. However, simulating sound propagation using wave-based methods often requires that the pressure is known at any given position and time, which is very expensive both in CPU and memory. In short, wave-based methods are more accurate in principle because they naturally simulate all the complex behaviors of waves. In his blog, our former colleague Benoit Alary explains diffraction, and describes the difference between ray-based and wave-based methods for simulating sound propagation. Wave-Based and Ray-Based Methods for Simulating Sound Propagation ![]() įigure 1 - Waves bend around edges due to diffraction.īefore considering why and how sound designers can use diffraction from a practical standpoint, it is necessary to describe what it is in more detail. This is the reason why voices sound somewhat dull when heard from next room”. Consequently, low-frequency sound waves will spread over a larger angle around a corner than high-frequency waves. On the other hand, behind large obstacles no sound is observed. If the obstacle is small compared to the wavelength, the propagation seems to be unhindered by the obstacle. “The amount of diffraction depends on the wavelength and the size of the obstacle. One of them is diffraction, which refers to “the bending of waves around the corners of an obstacle or through an aperture”. Sound propagates as a wave and is subject to its behaviors. Part 1: Distance Modeling and Early Reflections
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |